Merle Mitchell AM

Merle Mitchell AM
Following is the speech written and delivered by Eileen Sims on the 13 November 2022 at the memorial event for Merle Mitchell AM.

Image (c) Mark Wilson Media

Merle was a leader although she would probably not agree with me giving her that title. But she was a person who did effect change.  

Beginnings

In the 1970’s Springvale was developing as a new suburb: new housing estate with unmade roads. The 1971 census showed that the city’s population increased by 20,000 people. Springvale’s population had always been multicultural but now the census revealed that 32% of Springvale’s population were born overseas. While most of the new residents were English speaking there were others of non-English speaking countries- Italy, what was then called Yugoslavia, Germany, Netherlands, and Greece. 

Council at that time employed one social worker and a youth worker and the establishment of a Citizen’s Advisory Bureau (CAB) in the suburb was suggested. Questionnaires were distributed and the response showed that people agreed and many wanted to be involved. 

 A volunteer Committee of Management was formed and Merle became a member, taking on the role of secretary. Others who wanted to participate became volunteer staff members and participated in a community training program.  

Council provided accommodation at 5 Osborne Avenue and the centre, known as the Springvale Community Aid and Advice Bureau, came into being. In my talk I will refer to it as the ‘Bureau”. 

Staff

As the centre became busier and with more demands on the committee and workers it was realised a full-time Manager was needed. The position was created, funded by council, and Merle, who had taken on that role in a voluntary capacity, became the Bureau’s first paid employee.  

Who came? 

The 1970’s also saw the opening of Enterprise Migrant Hostel.   

Even for English speaking migrants settling into a new country as Australia it is difficult. For those without English language skills it is even more confusing, isolating and at times frightening.  

The new arrivals felt they were strangers and wanted to regain a sense of control in their lives. They needed jobs, to learn English, and to know their children were safe at school and able to learn.  

There were so many needs and questions. 

Merle and the staff recognised this and developed policy and programs specific to their needs.    

Communication 

One of the first requirements for the Bureau staff was to improve communication. Qualified interpreters were needed either in house or by phone. The Bureau was one of the first organisations to support the formation of the state run Telephone Interpreter Service.  

Training in how to work with interpreters became mandatory for all Bureau staff.  

Social and Ethnic workers 

Always looking ahead, Merle learnt that ethnic workers could be seconded from the Department of Immigration and she arranged with other ethnic agencies for their workers to be placed for a day or afternoon at the Bureau as well.  

She found out too that there was a Grant-in-Aid scheme funded by the Commonwealth Immigration Department for a social worker to assist in migrant settlement. 

The first social worker appointed at the Bureau was Jenny Briggs.  

The first ethnic worker was Juan Santa Isobel and together they developed the position of an ethnic aid worker in the Springvale Primary School, the first such position. A program that has now become a national program.  

Staff training in house 

Merle would say this CAB is different from other CABs mainly because of the non-English speaking population. Through Council funding a Volunteer Co-ordinator position was created to reach into the community for volunteers and the involvement of people from other cultures was encouraged. In-house cross-culture training was also mandatory and all staff needed to adapt their service delivery to meet the needs of the various migrant groups and refugees coming into the hostel.  

Roles of workers/Policy of agency 

As well as social and ethnic workers the Bureau employed a financial counsellor and a housing officer. The roles of all the workers focussed on giving information. Counselling and advocacy were tasks for the paid workers while their job descriptions also included community development aiming to encourage policy and practical changes in other organisations as they provided services for migrants. 

Adjusting to governmental policy change 

As government policies changed, the Bureau workers’ service delivery had to be flexible to meet these increasing demands. With the closure of Enterprise Hostel, new arrivals were moved straight into the community without support and the Bureau staff developed programs to fill these gaps. Workers from the Centre for the Survivors of Torture and Trauma were housed at the Bureau to work specifically with refugees who had experienced incarceration and torture.    

Then Enterprise reopened but with a limited supportive role. It was the Bureau social worker who took on the role of assisting orientation; walking new arrivals to the main shopping centre and leading them to schools, maternal and child care centres, library, Centrelink, the Community Health Centre and the council administrative centre. The last places being the Bureau and the Neighbourhood House to help them become acquainted to the services available to help them settle.  

Accountability 

Merle’s role always extended beyond the walls of the agency. She was adept in building relationships and had involvements in committees like VCOSS and ACOSS where her knowledge of what was happening at the grass-roots level could inform and influence change into government policies.   

Merle had the ability to infuse energy into everyone she was involved with: her staff, councillors, government heads, politicians and everyone she met regardless of who they were or the position they held.  

Without any doubt, to me, Merle was a dynamic leader. 

Eileen Sims© 2022

Eileen Sims

Question: Why can’t I get a resident parking permit?

At the 10 February 2025 Council Meeting, a question was raised about why the City of Greater Dandenong doesn’t offer parking permits – especially for elderly residents near the hospital, Chisholm, and other busy facilities. While the idea might seem like an easy fix, both research and local experience suggest that permits could end up creating more problems than they solve.


🚫 Exacerbating On-Street Parking Demand Through Misused Driveways

Residential parking permits might appear to solve parking shortages at first glance, but in practice they can backfire. In areas where homes lack built-in storage, residents might be tempted to repurpose their garages or driveways for storage, home offices, or even extra living space. This forces more cars onto already narrow, congested streets – creating a domino effect where one household’s decision pressures neighbours into similar compromises.


🚫 Administrative Burden and Enforcement Challenges

Implementing a permit system isn’t as straightforward as slapping on a sticker. Permits would need to display visible licence plate numbers and proof of residency, with annual checks to account for address changes or vehicle sales. Without strict oversight, there’s a risk of permits being resold or even shared illegally – an issue that Sydney’s Randwick Council has already grappled with. For Greater Dandenong, managing this would mean dedicating extra resources (and funds) away from vital services like road maintenance and public transport improvements.


🚫 Short-Term Fix, Long-Term Gridlock

While permits might ease parking stress for a few households in the short term, a broad roll-out could overwhelm available spaces. In busy areas near schools, shopping centres, or transport hubs, the mix of residents and non-residents vying for spots could create a “parking lottery” with no clear winner. In some regions, such schemes have even increased car dependency by simply redistributing parking rather than reducing the overall number of cars on the street.


Council Meeting Response: Addressing the Permit Debate

At the meeting, the following question was raised:

“Why does the City of Greater Dandenong not have parking permits? I have quite a few elderly residents who live near the hospital, Chisholm and large facilities where staff are taking all day parking, and these residents are unable to park near their houses. It would seem to justify a permit parking process, but Council does not entertain the idea of parking permits. Is there a way that we can overturn that?”

The initial response was straightforward:

“Yes, we do not provide parking permits. For these residents, I will ask my team to investigate and provide a solution. For the broader question, around the parking permits, we investigate at a later stage and see what the options are and what the benefits they could have.”

A further explanation clarified the council’s position:

  • Increased On-Street Parking: Research shows that residential permit schemes typically boost the number of cars parked on the street.
  • Trends in Other Councils: Many councils that once had permit systems are now phasing them out.
  • Limited Eligibility: Such schemes usually work in areas with far more dwellings than available on-street parking spaces – often limiting permits to only those without off-street parking.
  • Cost Implications: Permit schemes are generally offered at moderate to high costs, placing an extra burden on residents.
  • Permit Resale Concerns: There’s a significant worry that permits might be resold to local businesses or commuters, undermining the system’s intent.
  • Visitor Experience: In areas with permit schemes, visitors tend to have a poor parking experience.

Greater Dandenong has instead managed parking demands – especially those associated with hospitals, businesses, and other all-day uses – by implementing timed parking restrictions (like 2P parking during the day). This approach keeps streets clear during peak hours while still allowing residents to park overnight and on weekends. Council officers are more than happy to discuss further changes on any other streets with local residents.


Why Greater Dandenong Resists Permits

The city’s refusal to adopt parking permits isn’t about ignoring residents’ concerns – it’s about taking a holistic, long-term view of urban planning. Instead of a reactive “sticker solution,” Greater Dandenong is focused on:

  • Discouraging Garage Misuse: Promoting better storage solutions and zoning reforms to maintain off-street parking.
  • Investing in Alternatives: Improving bus routes, bike infrastructure, and pedestrian access to cut car dependency.
  • Future-Proofing: Planning mixed-use developments with adequate parking, rather than relying on temporary fixes.

In the end, while parking permits might offer a short-term fix for some, they risk entrenching car-centric habits and ultimately make on-street parking even more competitive. The emphasis remains on tackling the root causes of congestion and investing in sustainable, community-friendly solutions.

Former Cr Zaynoun Melhem

Speech from Mayor Cr Long

Zaynoun, we remember you as a young boy (we understand this was probably both a blessing and a curse for you!), and we watched as you proudly followed in your father’s footsteps.  Having seen how hard you worked for your local residents, representing local views and priorities  – we absolutely know you didn’t take anything for granted.   We have enjoyed standing with you in the Council Chamber and we acknowledge the strong relationships you have established both inside this building and in the communities you served. 

Mayor Cr Angela Long, Former Cr Zaynoun Melhem. 9 March 2021
Read More »

Former Cr Matthew Kirwan

Matthew, you recognised that participation is a key feature of a well-functioning community and you played a very strong advocacy role in creating a more inclusive and engaged city – determined to empower residents and community groups whilst highlighting and working towards addressing many human rights disparities.

Mayor Cr Angela Long, Former Cr Matthew Kirwan, Deputy Mayor Cr Sophie Tan . 9 March 2021
Read More »

Former Cr Youhorn Chea

Speech from Mayor Cr Long

Youhorn, during your 23 years on Council you acted as a great ambassador for the city. You openly shared the details of your journey of arriving and settling in Australia as a refugee. This honesty sparked an important ‘rethink’ in how we view social cohesion and helped us develop a respectful pathway forward for all people in our city to feel valued and accepted, and enjoy a genuine sense of belonging. I would now like to read the key points from your letter under seal.

Mayor Cr Angela Long, Former Cr and Mayor Youhorn Chea and Deputy Mayor Cr Sophie Tan. 9 March 2021
Read More »