ANZAC Day reflections — Ray Bastin, 1st Deepdene Scouts

Ray Bastin, Group Leader of 1st Deepdene Scouts, in Scout uniform with service medals

An address delivered by Ray Bastin, Group Leader of 1st Deepdene Scouts, after the Springvale RSL ANZAC Commemorative Service on Sunday 19 April 2026 (Springvale Town Hall Gardens and Cenotaph). Shared here with permission.

Ray Bastin, Group Leader of 1st Deepdene Scouts, in Scout uniform with service medals
Ray Bastin at the Springvale RSL ANZAC Commemorative Service, 19 April 2026.

Good afternoon. When my father-in-law asked me to speak today about my connection to ANZAC Day, it sparked a lot of reflection. My name is Ray Bastin, I am Group Leader at 1st Deepdene Scouts, and today I’d like to share how the spirit of ANZAC Day resonates with me and my journey in leadership and community service.

I remember growing up with the stories of family members serving in the armed forces. My father Ron spent 6 years in the Air Force. My Grandfather, William (Bill) Bastin went off to the second world war in 1940. He fought in Palestine and then in New Guinea. A couple of his brothers also went off to war, one convincing the Army he was 18 when he joined. At the end of WW2, he decided to stay in, going on to fight in other wars during his career.

But for all the stories I heard, there was one that has stuck with me more than others. It is the story of one of Bill’s older brothers, William James Archibald Bastin, better known as Arch. He joined up in July 1915, and he went Missing in Action in 1916 only to be listed as Killed in Action a year later. He had died somewhere in France. I remember being told his mother always believed he was still alive and living somewhere in Europe, but I believe it was because she couldn’t bear the pain of losing her son.

The story of my great uncle Arch stayed with me over the years, and I found little snippets of information that kept stirring my interest in his story.

Finding Arch

On my first trip to Canberra about 15 years ago, we went to the Australian War Memorial. I remembered that Arch’s name was listed somewhere. On walking into the memorial, I remember looking at all the names and enormity of the task of finding him struck me. Luckily you can do a name search, and with the help from some friendly staff members, we were able to locate his name. The emotion I felt surprised me. This started a desire to find out more about his life.

He was born in 1898. When he enlisted in July 1915, he said he was 18 years 5 months, there was a signed note from his parents attesting to it. His first unit was with the 9th Reinforcements 8th Battalion. He left Australia on 15 September 1915 and landed at ANZAC Cove on 7 December 1915. I know they saw action on their first day, because in the War Diary it mentions that 8th & 9th Reinforcements joined the 8th Battalion, with the loss of a Lieutenant and 1 man from the 9th, 2 other men wounded.

Along with the rest of the Australians, he was evacuated later that month. He arrived in Alexandria on 7 January 1916. In February he was transferred to the 60th Battalion and a month later the 59th. He spent the next few months in Egypt at the Suez Canal. During this time, he was admitted to hospital with an ingrown toenail, an affliction I suffered from when I was 16.

On 18 June 1916 he left Alexandria, arriving in Marseilles 11 days later. A train ride later he found himself on the Western Front in a little town called Fromelles in the north east of France.

On the night of 19 July 1916, the newly arrived Australian troops were sent into action. The men were sent over the top at 6pm in 4 waves at 5-minute intervals. The German trenches were 400m away. The next morning, he was listed as Missing in Action. A year later, at a Court of Enquiry, he was listed as Killed in Action — Presumed buried in No Man’s Land.

He was just one of the 5,533 casualties from that action, with almost 2,000 killed.

A journey of discovery

Just over 2 years ago, we planned a family holiday to France. Besides the usual tourist sites, I wanted to go to Fromelles to find my Great Uncle. My wife Kris, the event planner that she is, researched the Western Front to include other things into our itinerary. In April 2024, Kris, our son Archer and I, along with Kris’s parents, went to France.

Our journey of discovery started in Ypres, Belgium. The In Flanders Fields Museum was the most interesting museum I have ever been in. It reflected on the fact that on the battlefield, the line between winning and losing is blurred by shared sacrifice. Even the victor returns with a piece of themselves missing, but the lessons of service and the scars of history remain. It displayed the First World War as it was — no winners, no glory, just men and women who gave their lives in the name of service and those who had to sacrifice their lives when the war was fought on their doorstep.

Whilst staying in Ypres, we attended the daily Last Post Ceremony at the Menin Gate, where we laid a wreath on behalf of the 1st Deepdene Scout Group. It was bitterly cold that day and standing and talking with others who were laying wreaths for their own reasons, we all realised we had connections to this area through family who had seen combat there. It was then I realised many have their own stories of family who went to war and never returned home.

A couple of days later we travelled to Fromelles. A look around the Museum, a wander through the Pheasant Wood cemetery and others dotted around the French countryside, and my mind was thinking of Great Uncle Arch. How the landscape he saw would have looked very different from the idyllic farmland there now. We made our way to VC Corner, the Cemetery and Memorial where his name is listed. The Cemetery contains 410 unidentified bodies that were retrieved from the battlefield two years after the battle. The only known thing about them is they were all Australian. The Memorial lists 1,300 Australian soldiers who were lost in the battle and who have no known resting place. It is also the closest cemetery to where the 59th Battalion fought.

I found Arch’s name rather quickly, and after some quiet reflection and laying a poppy, I looked out over the surrounding fields, which were once no man’s land. There was a peacefulness in the place. The canola flowers hiding any evidence of its gory past. There was a freshly tilled paddock on one side and it was easy to imagine how thick the mud would be once it rained.

Villers-Bretonneux

On ANZAC Day 2024, I rose earlier than I usually do on this day. As a family, we made our way for the Dawn Service at Villers-Bretonneux. It was a service that I will remember forever — not that it was much different from others, but for the crowd it draws. You had your Aussies and Kiwis, but there were more French citizens in the crowd than I had expected. It was also very sobering to attend a service where our troops had actually been and fought.

The town of Villers-Bretonneux has an interesting connection with Australia, and in particular Victoria. Many Victorian soldiers were stationed here and billeted by local families, but like much of France, the town suffered damage. Surviving soldiers stayed on and with the help of their families and communities back home, raised funds to rebuild the school. The school still stands today and has a memorial that says “Never forget Australia”. On ANZAC Day the town was filled with Australian and French flags and seeing the way the French look after all the fallen, it was truly a humbling experience.

Lest we forget

To the Scouts I lead, I strive to convey that ANZAC Day is not about celebrating conquest, but about the solemnity of reflection. I want them to understand that in war, there are no true winners. For every battle won, something precious is lost — even by the victor. I teach them that while glory is fleeting, the cost of that glory is permanent.

ANZAC Day is a day we should use to honour those men and women who have served their country, in times of peace and war, and above all, remember those who have fallen. If we forget them, then they are truly gone and we are doomed to make the same mistakes of the past.

Conference Report


MAV Victorian Convention of Councillors

Dates: 21–23 March 2025
Attendees and Report Authors:

  • Cr Isabella Do
  • Cr Sean O’Reilly
  • Cr Alice Phuong Le
  • Cr Melinda Yim

Key Themes and Learnings

1. Opening Address – Kelly Grigsby, CEO of MAV

Kelly Grigsby emphasised the need for adaptive and forward-thinking leadership in local government. She highlighted:

  • Over $142 billion in local government assets across Victoria.
  • Councils generate $6 billion in annual revenue and deliver $4 billion in capital works.
  • Greater Dandenong alone manages approximately $3 billion in assets.
    Grigsby urged councils to adopt data-driven, community-centric leadership.

Sources:

  • Results of 2022–23 Audits: Local Government – Victorian Auditor-General’s Office
  • Asset Plan 2022–23 to 2031–32 – Greater Dandenong Council

2. Councils as Shapers of the Future – Kelly Grigsby (continued)

  • Trust in local government is growing relative to other government levels.
  • Leadership must involve strategic foresight, clarity, and a commitment to equity and transparency.

3. Address by the Minister – Hon. Nick Staikos MP

  • Acknowledged financial pressures on councils.
  • Announced a review of rate capping policy.
  • Urged councils to deliver services efficiently and explore new revenue and investment models.
  • Praised local government efforts during the COVID-19 pandemic.

4. Financial Sustainability – Marcus Spiller (SGS Economics & Planning)

  • Introduced the three pillars: subsidiarity, fiscal autonomy/accountability, and horizontal fiscal equalisation.
  • Advocated for increased local government investment.
  • Highlighted inter-council collaboration in aged care delivery.

5. Political Disruption & Trust – George Megalogenis

  • Observed global trends in political instability and their Australian parallels.
  • Local government holds 40% public trust, above state/federal at 35%.
  • Questions raised on the future of party politics and structural reform.

6. Councillor Wellbeing – Jess Scully

  • Urged councillors to pace themselves and avoid excessive criticism of staff.
  • Suggested focusing on one major project per year.
  • Advocated identifying underserved communities and acting as connectors.

7. Values-Based Leadership – Chris Kotur AM

  • Emphasised that trust is fragile and hard-won.
  • Noted excessive Notices of Motion (NoMs) can indicate poor communication.
  • Encouraged a “no surprises” governance culture.
  • Promoted respectful disagreement and focus on policy over personality.

8. Integrity in Public Life – Nick McKenzie

  • Detailed cases of misconduct in councils like Moonee Valley and Casey.
  • Called for stronger enforcement of codes of conduct and a culture of integrity.
  • Warned that community trust is slow to build, fast to lose.

9. Oversight & Standards – David Wolf

  • Outlined the role of the Parliamentary Workplace Standards and Integrity Commission.
  • Common issues: ignoring breaches, political theatre, and disrespect in meetings.
  • Councils urged to maintain strong internal policies and professionalism.

10. Leadership Styles & Ethics – Dr Graeme Emonson PSM

  • Distinguished between transactional, transformational, charismatic, narcissistic, and authentic leadership.
  • Advocated for authentic, values-driven leadership.
  • Highlighted the link between ethical leadership and employee discretionary effort.

11. Treaty Process – Rueben Berg

  • Spoke on embedding Aboriginal leadership in local government.
  • Encouraged genuine engagement with Traditional Owners.
  • Emphasised shared governance and reconciliation beyond symbolism.

12. Gendered Hate Speech – Cr Dr Anjalee de Silva

  • Exposed the structural silencing of women through online abuse.
  • Presented research showing many women are deterred from entering politics.
  • Called for legal protections, institutional support, and counter-speech strategies.

13. Racial Resilience – Cr Mohamed Semra

  • Shared personal experiences of racism in public office.
  • Rejected assimilation as a condition for participation.
  • Advocated for anti-racist policies and platform-sharing leadership.

14. Leadership Panel – Mayors and Deputy Mayors

Speakers included:

  • Cr Michelle Cowan (Wodonga)
  • Cr Andrew Davenport (Whitehorse)
  • Cr John Dougall (Mitchell)
  • Cr Mia Shaw (Wyndham)

Key messages:

  • Avoid bloc voting and personal agendas.
  • Leverage community creativity for cost-effective solutions.
  • Promote transparency, collaboration, and humility in governance.

Closing Reflections

The Convention reinforced that councillors play a pivotal role in shaping Victoria’s communities. Key takeaways included:

  • The value of integrity and inclusivity.
  • The importance of strategic foresight and ethical leadership.
  • That real impact arises not just from rule compliance but from genuine commitment to public trust and equity.

Greater Dandenong City Council remains committed to translating these insights into meaningful community action.


END OF REPORT


Report: MAV State Council

Date: Friday 16 May 2025
Location: Melbourne Town Hall, Swanston Street, Melbourne

Authors:
• Cr Sean O’Reilly
• Marjan Hajjari, Executive Manager Strategic Growth & Advocacy


Address by the Minister for Local Government – Hon. Nick Staikos MP

The Minister addressed the assembly with key insights and updates affecting local government:

Councillor Behaviour and Governance

  • Six councils currently have monitors in place due to governance concerns.
  • Poor councillor behaviour negatively impacts decision-making, staff morale, and community trust.
  • Most misconduct involves interactions among councillors.
  • Personal attacks on social media are a growing concern.

CEO Recruitment Support

  • LGMap will assist councils in recruiting CEOs by offering best-practice tools and frameworks.

Key Policy and Operational Issues

Waste Management

  • Waste services remain a top statewide issue.
  • Graffiti removal is not considered a priority.

Rate Capping and Financial Sustainability

  • Hepburn Shire’s 10% rate cap variation was supported due to strong long-term planning.
  • Suggestion: Councils should seek advice or coaching from the Essential Services Commission (ESC) on the feasibility of rate cap variations.

Council Assets and Representation

  • Local governments manage over $140 billion in assets.
  • 28 councils have 50% women councillors; overall, about 43% of councillors are women.
  • Councils are encouraged to formally recognise women’s contributions to leadership.

Rates Collection and Financial Hardship

  • Financial hardship policies vary across councils.
  • A standardised approach is recommended to ensure equity.

Public Libraries

  • Public perception of libraries as community hubs has risen from ~50% in 2006 to ~80% in 2022.
  • A revised funding model for libraries is under consideration.

Municipal Association of Victoria (MAV) Updates

Financial Position

  • MAV is exploring an expansion of its fee-for-service model.
  • A small deficit was reported, attributed to service expansion.
  • Commercial Crime Fund and Liability Mutual Insurance (LMI) are still operational.
  • The LGE Health Plan reported a surplus.
  • The overall deficit was driven by LMI but is expected to recover in FY 2024–25.
  • MAV remains solvent and continues to invest to increase income.

Advocacy and Reform

  • MAV is advocating for reform of the Financial Services Levy (FSL).
  • The Emergency Services Levy has been criticised as a cost shift.
  • Planning reforms are currently in progress.

Strategic Planning and Innovation

  • The Future of Local Government Taskforce is exploring long-term sustainability.
  • MAV is investigating AI projects to improve efficiency.
  • A mayoral delegation to Canberra is planned for August to influence national policy.

Motions at MAV State Council

The MAV State Council session included debate on several strategic and contested motions:

Notable Motions

  1. Motion 13 – Waste Service Charge
    • Contested due to being viewed as insufficient.
  2. Debate on Toxic Online Media
    • Addressed councillor safety and integrity concerns.
  3. Debate on Asylum Seekers
    • Varied views were expressed on council roles in advocacy.

Date: 2 June 2025

END OF REPORT


Let me know if you’d like this exported as a .docx or .html file for uploading.

How rates are calculated

Four steps to calculate rates

Note: Some councils add a waste or municipal charge on top, but this basic calculation is the same everywhere in Victoria.

Example

Example only for education purposes.

Cleanliness in Springvale

Photo credit Gary Sissons/ Dandenong Journal

Clean look at dirty market | Dandenong Star Journal

Motion

Author: Cr Sean O’Reilly
Notice of Motion: Addressing Cleanliness and Odour Issues in Springvale Activity Centre

Resolution unanimously approved by Council on 9 December 2024

Preamble

Ongoing complaints have highlighted the growing issue of cleanliness and odour problems in the Springvale Activity Centre, particularly around Springvale Market. This motion aims to address the concerns raised by both residents and traders by developing a structured approach to enhance the precinct’s reputation, thereby improving trade and amenity.

Background

Ongoing cleanliness and odour issues have significantly impacted local businesses, residents, and visitors, leading to financial losses, potential health hazards, and a decline in the area’s overall amenity.

Springvale Market, which is Greater Dandenong’s busiest activity centre, is central to this issue. Both residents and traders have expressed concerns about the persistent odour and cleanliness problems.

By preparing this report, the Council demonstrates its commitment to resolving these problems through a structured and informed approach, ensuring the well-being of the community and the sustainability of local businesses.

Motion

That officers prepare a comprehensive report within 4 months detailing the costs and strategies necessary to enhance cleanliness and assist odour mitigation within the Springvale Activity Centre, encompassing Springvale Market.

This report should include, but not be limited to:

Investigation of Sources

The report should identify the primary contributors to cleanliness and odour problems, including improper waste disposal practices by local businesses and any infrastructure deficiencies.

Enforcement Measures

It should evaluate current enforcement efforts and provide recommendations for enhancing compliance with waste disposal regulations and public health standards.

Infrastructure Improvements

The report should assess existing drainage and waste management systems, proposing upgrades or maintenance plans to prevent future occurrences.

Council Cleaning Activities

An analysis of the current frequency and effectiveness of Council’s cleaning activities in the area is required, with recommendations for recalibration to better address cleanliness concerns. The report should also include a comparison of the resources allocated to the Springvale Activity Centre with those allocated to the Dandenong Market, identifying any disparities and ensuring a comparable distribution of cleaning services.

Community Engagement

The report should outline the engagement of key stakeholders such as local traders, business associations, and residents to ensure comprehensive participation and feedback.

Measurement

Metrics should include periodic cleanliness audits, surveys of community satisfaction, and analysis of reported incidents. Compliance with waste disposal standards and the effectiveness of trader engagement efforts should also be tracked. The metric scores may be publicly reported on the council’s website.

Cost Analysis

A detailed breakdown of the financial implications associated with the proposed strategies should be included, along with potential funding sources or budget allocations. The report should also feature a cost-benefit analysis to demonstrate the potential savings or benefits from mitigating these issues.

Wards with progressive results

Wards where a candidate did not achieve 50% of primary votes

Summary Table of Progressive Results by Ward

Ward NameTotal EnrolmentFormal VotesInformal VotesTotal Votes PolledVoting Percentage of EnrolledInformal Vote Percentage
Keysborough Ward88647269225749484.54%3.00%
Springvale Central83666970170714085.35%2.38%
Springvale North78316401149655083.64%2.27%
Springvale South85127092260735286.37%3.54%
Cleeland81025842259610675.38%4.24%
Keysborough South91847793181797486.82%2.27%

By Ward

Keysborough Ward

CandidateVote TotalVote Percentage
YIM, Melinda305842.07%
PINCHEIRA, Reinaldo1782.45%
BROWN, Peter210428.94%
IN, Hemara2152.96%
GOV, Tevyn3284.51%
DANG, Daniel79210.90%
AKKURT, Sinan5948.17%

Springvale Central Ward

CandidateVote TotalVote Percentage
BUNLAY, Meng163623.47%
TRUONG, Hor6128.78%
DALTON, Brian98714.16%
LE, Phuong166923.95%
LE, Minh162823.36%
STEBBINGS, Sean4386.28%

Keysborough South Ward

CandidateVote TotalVote Percentage
MUZUR, Ajdin127416.35%
BRYANT, Alexandra134017.19%
DO, Isabella370347.52%
GONSALVEZ, Geraldine6798.71%
JANKOVIC, Sasha79710.23%

Springvale North Ward

CandidateVote TotalVote Percentage
DINH, Huong123419.28%
HOLL, Angela226235.34%
O’REILLY, Sean290545.38%

Springvale South Ward

CandidateVote TotalVote Percentage
HEM, Malab71210.04%
YIM, Thayhorn136419.23%
TRUONG, Loi242934.25%
TRAN, Andy120617.01%
SOK, Lin6419.04%
THAI, Yen74010.43%

Cleeland Ward

CandidateVote TotalVote Percentage
GARAD, Rhonda202534.63%
HAYDAR BIG, Zahra135623.19%
LONG, Angela180430.85%
HEMAVATHARA, Pradeep66211.32%

Finalised wards

By Ward

Dandenong Ward

CandidateVote PercentageVote Total
MEMETI, Jim62.78%3466
RUZAI, Rahima37.22%2055
  • Total Enrolment: 7905
  • Total Votes Polled: 5978 (75.66% of enrolled voters)
  • Informal Votes: 457 (7.64%)

Dandenong North Ward

CandidateVote PercentageVote Total
FORMOSO, Daniel13.39%985
TANNOUS, Rhonda26.15%1924
TOMIC, Branka4.02%296
MILKOVIC, Bob52.03%3828
IERONE, Rosana4.42%325
  • Total Enrolment: 9019
  • Total Votes Polled: 7556 (83.78% of enrolled voters)
  • Informal Votes: 198 (2.62%)

Noble Park North Ward

CandidateVote PercentageVote Total
AGRAVANTE, Love29.81%2082
RATHNAYAKE, Karl6.90%482
FORMOSO, Lana55.45%3873
BILLINGS, Will7.85%548
  • Total Enrolment: 8660
  • Total Votes Polled: 7170 (82.79% of enrolled voters)
  • Informal Votes: 185 (2.58%)

Yarraman Ward

CandidateVote PercentageVote Total
COOK, Ian41.34%2600
DANH, Phillip58.66%3690
  • Total Enrolment: 8300
  • Total Votes Polled: 6604 (79.57% of enrolled voters)
  • Informal Votes: 314 (4.75%)

Ward comparison

Summary Table of Provisional Results by Ward

Ward NameTotal EnrolmentFormal VotesInformal VotesTotal Votes PolledVoting Percentage of EnrolledInformal Vote Percentage
Dandenong North Ward90197358198755683.78%2.62%
Noble Park North Ward86606985185717082.79%2.58%
Dandenong Ward79055521457597875.66%7.64%
Yarraman Ward83006290314660479.57%4.75%

2024 Election results so far

Group A

Group A is all votes received by the VEC up to 6pm Friday 25th October.

Group A were all counted by Friday 1 November.

Group B

Group B is all votes received by the VEC after 6pm Friday 25th October.

Group B votes will be counted on Wednesday 6 November .

WardTimeVotes
Cleeland9:00 am975
Keysborough9:00 am962
Noble Park North9:00 am920
Dandenong10:45 am1027
Springvale Central10:45 am844
Keysborough South11:00 am1392
Springvale North12:00 pm775
Dandenong North1:00 pm1088
Yarraman1:00 pm968
Springvale South1:40 pm904
Group B Count schedule

Ward results, alphabetical by ward name

Cleeland Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Rhonda Garad1,75635.6%
Zahra Haydar Big1,05921.5%
Angela Long1,57531.9%
Pradeep Hewavitharana54211.0%
Informal Votes2134.1%
Total5,145

Dandenong North Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Bob Milkovic3,38553.6%
Daniel Formoso79212.5%
Rhonda Tannous1,61825.6%
Rosana Ierone2664.2%
Branka Tomic2594.1%
Informal Votes1612.5%
Total6,481

Dandenong Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Jim Memeti2,93463.7%
Rahima Rizai1,66936.3%
Informal Votes3637.3%
Total4,966

Keysborough South Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Isabella Do3,13548.6%
Alexandra Bryant1,11817.3%
Ajdin Muzur1,02115.8%
Sasha Jankovic64810.0%
Geraldine Gonsalvez5338.3%
Informal Votes1382.1%
Total6,593

Keysborough Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Melinda Yim2,67342.0%
Peter Brown1,87829.5%
Daniel Dang69610.9%
Sinan Akkurt4907.7%
Tevyn Gov2784.4%
Hemara In1883.0%
Reinaldo Ivan Pincheira1542.4%
Informal Votes1852.8%
Total6,542

Noble Park North Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Lana Formoso3,45056.4%
Will Billings1,80329.5%
Love Agravante4597.5%
Karl Rathnayake4016.6%
Informal Votes1482.4%
Total6,261

Springvale Central Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Meng Bunlay1,44823.5%
Alice Phuong Le1,48624.1%
Minh Le1,46723.8%
Brian Dalton86714.0%
Hor Truong5368.7%
Sean Stebbings3686.0%
Informal Votes1302.1%
Total6,302

Informal Votes: 130

Total Votes: 6302

Springvale North Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Sean O’Reilly2,64446.7%
Angela Holl1,94834.4%
Huong Dinh1,06418.8%
Informal Votes1292.2%
Total5,785

Springvale South Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Loi Truong2,18134.9%
Thayhorn Yim1,20519.3%
Andy Tran1,06217.0%
Yen Thai63610.2%
Malab Hem5969.5%
Lin Sok5619.0%
Informal Votes2163.3%
Total6,457

Yarraman Ward

CandidateVotesPercentage
Phillip Danh3,12558.0%
Ian Cook2,26142.0%
Informal Votes2574.6%
Total5,643

Single-member vs Multi-member Councillor Wards

The debate over single-member wards versus multi-member wards in Victoria, Australia, involves various arguments from different stakeholders. Here is a summary of the key points:

Arguments For Single-Member Wards:

  1. Direct Representation: Proponents argue that single-member wards provide more direct representation, as each councillor is accountable to a specific area and its residents24.
  2. Local Focus: Single-member wards are seen as promoting a local focus, with councillors being more aware of local issues and more accessible to residents34.
  3. Simplified Accountability: It is argued that single-member wards make councillors more accountable to their local communities, as they are elected by and serve a specific ward24.

Arguments Against Single-Member Wards:

The debate over single-member wards versus multi-member wards in Victoria, Australia, involves various arguments from different stakeholders. Here is a summary of the key points:

Arguments For Single-Member Wards:

  1. Direct Representation: Proponents argue that single-member wards provide more direct representation, as each councillor is accountable to a specific area and its residents.
  2. Local Focus: Single-member wards are seen as promoting a local focus, with councillors being more aware of local issues and more accessible to residents.
  3. Simplified Accountability: It is argued that single-member wards make councillors more accountable to their local communities, as they are elected by and serve a specific ward.

Arguments Against Single-Member Wards:

  1. Limited Representation: Critics argue that single-member wards can lead to limited representation, as they may favor major parties and reduce diversity in council representation.
  2. Parochial Interests: Single-member wards can lead to councillors being preoccupied with parochial interests rather than considering the municipality as a whole.
  3. Vulnerability to Demographic Shifts: Single-member wards are more susceptible to boundary changes due to demographic shifts, which can lead to frequent adjustments and instability.

Arguments For Multi-Member Wards:

  1. Broader Representation: Multi-member wards are seen as providing a broader representation of communities, as they can accommodate diverse interests and groups within a larger area.
  2. Shared Responsibilities: Multi-member wards allow councillors to share workloads and responsibilities, potentially leading to more effective governance.
  3. Stability: Multi-member wards tend to be less affected by demographic shifts and thus require fewer boundary adjustments, providing more stability.

Arguments Against Multi-Member Wards:

  1. Complexity: Critics argue that multi-member wards can lead to complexity in governance, as councillors may form groups based on ward affiliations, potentially leading to divisions within the council.
  2. Less Local Focus: Multi-member wards may lead to councillors being less focused on very local issues, as they serve a larger area.
  3. Potential for Dummy Candidates: Multi-member wards can make it easier for dummy candidates to be elected, particularly if they are part of a voting ticket.

Overall, the debate highlights the trade-offs between direct representation and broader community representation, as well as the potential for both stability and complexity in governance structures.

Arguments For Multi-Member Wards:

  1. Broader Representation: Multi-member wards are seen as providing a broader representation of communities, as they can accommodate diverse interests and groups within a larger area34.
  2. Shared Responsibilities: Multi-member wards allow councillors to share workloads and responsibilities, potentially leading to more effective governance23.
  3. Stability: Multi-member wards tend to be less affected by demographic shifts and thus require fewer boundary adjustments, providing more stability34.

Arguments Against Multi-Member Wards:

  1. Complexity: Critics argue that multi-member wards can lead to complexity in governance, as councillors may form groups based on ward affiliations, potentially leading to divisions within the council3.
  2. Less Local Focus: Multi-member wards may lead to councillors being less focused on very local issues, as they serve a larger area3.
  3. Potential for Dummy Candidates: Multi-member wards can make it easier for dummy candidates to be elected, particularly if they are part of a voting ticket35.

Aged and Disability Services

As a committed advocate for the most vulnerable members of our community, I want to reassure all residents that my past decisions and current platform strongly support the continuation of the City of Greater Dandenong’s vital Aged and Disability Care Service program. There is no plan to change the council’s delivery of these essential services. Any future decision on the continuation or modification of these services will be made by a new council, of which I am a candidate.

No candidate for council can guarantee that any service will be provided indefinitely, as all services of council are subject to periodic review. Councillors are required to consider all new information and evidence up to the point of making any decision.

Further, while candidates may make pledges during their campaigns, once elected, councillors must vote on proposals with an open mind, considering the most current evidence available. Promising to vote a particular way without regard to new information or evidence could be seen as contravening the Local Government Act 2020, which mandates that councillors make informed and balanced decisions in the best interests of the community.

I understand the critical importance of aged care services to our community, and if re-elected, I will work diligently with my fellow councillors and relevant stakeholders to ensure that any future decisions are made with the best interests of our residents at heart.

Rather than seeking election promises from councillors who are running for re-election, I suggest that electors consider a councillor’s past decision-making history as an indication of how they may approach future resolutions if re-elected.

Motion passed at council meeting – 25 March 2024

Further reading:
https://dandenong.starcommunity.com.au/news/2024-04-02/reprieve-for-home-care-services/

https://www.greaterdandenong.vic.gov.au/contact-us/news-and-media/council-affirms-its-commitment-continuing-provision-disability-and-aged

https://www.lgi.vic.gov.au/summer-2022-23-local-government-integrity-matters/councillors-must-have-open-mind

Authorised by Sean O'Reilly, PO Box 421, Springvale VIC 3171